News‎ > ‎

Should You Run a 6-2 Offense?

posted Mar 23, 2015, 9:06 AM by Debbie Sokol

If you’ve been following NCAA volleyball you likely will have seen the increase in the use of 6-2 offensive systems since the rules changed to allow 15 subs. Of course we’re not talking the old definition of 6-2 when everyone played all the way around and the setters were attackers in the front row. That was the system Karch played in at UCLA. These days at the NCAA level 6-2 means swapping Opposites and Setters every three rotations. The 15 subs makes this possible.

Obviously, the idea behind this kind of system is to always have three front row attackers and to have a bigger block against the opposing OH. The question, though, is whether that actually makes your team better in practice, not just in theory. To my mind, if you’re thinking about running a 6-2 instead of a 5-1 then there are some things you need to consider first.

Leadership – For many teams the setter is the leader on the court. Leadership is something you want to be consistent. By definition, swapping your leaders in and out every three rotations works against that. This may not be a big deal if the two setters have very similar personalities or the primary leader on the court comes from another position.

Set Consistency – Hitters tend to do best when the sets they get have a consistent tempo and rhythm. This is the challenge of the 6-2 offense. You need to have two setters who set very similarly so hitters aren’t having to constantly adjust. Also, are your setters consistent and accurate back-setting? If not, you won’t get much added benefit from having the extra hitter in those three rotations.

Defense – Let’s face it. Setters don’t always play the best defense. They tend to think about setting first, which can mean they cheat a bit, leave balls to others they should play, etc. Running a 6-2 means always having that little bit of softness in the back court defense – and always having a target for the opposing team to attack to take your offense out of system. Of course you may not be any better off having an OPP playing back there, though you could use a defensive specialist.

Blocking – How much of a benefit are you really getting from having the bigger blocker? That’s supposed to be part of the reason for going with the 6-2, but does it actually hold up? Setters, despite their smaller stature, can be quite effective blockers. They may not get as many stuffs, but they can get useful touches and they tend to be smart in terms of being able to position their block correctly. There is also the question as to whether the opposition can actually take advantage of the smaller blocker, which simply isn’t the case at many levels.

Offense – Do you actually gain an advantage from having the extra front row attacker? If you have a good middle slide and/or back row attack, then you may find that there is no real extra benefit from always having three hitters across the net – especially if there is any set consistency issue, as discussed above.

The point of all this is that you actually should be looking for tangible evidence that one system is better than the other. It’s not enough to go on the theoretical. Find ways you can objectively measure the differences and get to it! John Forman, Exeter


Comments